10 Dec 2012

Capacitive Proximity Sensing Technology Update

Patrick Hanley, Marketing Manager at Atmel looks at capacitive techniques for interacting remotely with a user interface.

Capacitive Touch Technology is still all the rave in the user interface space, as it rightfully should be.

It is becoming rarer that someone wouldn’t have a smartphone with a touchscreen on it today. And the thought of carrying a paper planner or even a notepad around is almost archaic as your capacitive touchscreen tablet can do all of that, plus enable you to surf the web, read a book, look at pictures, and chat with friends, all through one device.

The interface to these products helps to make the appeal associated with them, the ease of use, and the fun they are to interact with.

Capacitive interfaces enable all this, with no moving components which would break down over time, no gaps or creases which can get containments in them which are really tough to clean, low-power to make it so your battery life is longer, and the ability to reliably detect and reject a finger press when it is supposed to, even in noisy conditions.

Improving touch technology

Since they already offer so much, how could you make them better? What if there was a way you could interact with your phone, remote control, thermostat, etc. without actually touching a surface? Almost as if the electrical device knows what you are going to do before you actually do it? That remote know-how is called proximity detection.

Self capacitance proximity detection

Self capacitance proximity detection Hand coupling with the electric-field

Imagine as you arrive home from a long day at work, open the door and move your hand over the area your home control panel is located; this home control panel then lights-up and comes alive through capacitive proximity detection. It provides you with options to turn the lights on, open the blinds, and listen to music by simply touching it.

There are still so many other applications where this technology can be revolutionary. The ability to control the signal strength of a device, based on his immediate surroundings can be done through this technology.

FCC regulations

There are FCC regulations in place that specify how much WiFi and RF exposure that is allowed for electronics to emit in the close presence of a human being, these are known as Specific Absorption Rates (SAR). Many tablets are implementing capacitive proximity detection for this purpose today.

QTouchADC sensing algorithm is based on standard self-capacitance

QTouchADC sensing algorithm is based on standard self-capacitance, the SAR ADC is over-sampled

Mobile phones are upgrading their current IR sensors so that you don’t see the ugly windows and direct sunlight doesn’t turn your screen off or on unexpectedly through capacitive proximity.

A wireless mouse is yet another example , where the user is immediately moving the cursor with the mouse instead of having to shake-it to wake it up. Automotive applications in car handles, center consoles, light fixtures, and even the trunk so you can open it while you have both hands full of groceries.

As can be seen, proximity detection can take an already great technology in capacitive sensing, and make it even more interactive.

Capacitive touch benefits

Not only does this add a “cool” element to your device through this interface technology, but also can improve many other aspects of your product:

1. Power - Increases the length of time that your device can run on one set of batteries since the power consumption is actually less. Let’s say there are 16-buttons on a panel, instead of all 16-capacitive buttons having to continuously wake-up, determine if there is a finger press, and then go back to sleep, over and over, now the buttons can stay in sleep mode until after the proximity detection has been triggered. This will save upwards of 16x the power.

2. 3D Gesturing – With proximity ranges as far as 10” (25cm) it is possible to implement 3D gestures so that the user can simply wave their hand in front of the sensors and increase the volume of the TV or turn the page of their book, etc. There are no limits to what could potentially be unlocked taking this technology from 2-dimensions to 3.

3. Replacing IR – Today’s most common method of doing proximity detection in electronics is infrared (IR). There are many downsides to IR though that capacitive proximity detection can overcome. IR needs a lot of power to drive the LED and can be very expensive, that isn’t needed with capacitive. IR has to have visible windows on the screen, also not needed with capacitive. IR can be fooled by changing lighting conditions like direct sunlight, this will not happen with capacitive.

Capacitive touch implementations

There are 2-primary implementations of capacitive sensing, self capacitance, where you are measuring the capacitance delta between one electrode and earth ground (your hand), and mutual capacitance, where you are measuring the capacitance change between two electrodes.

There are many variations of each of these (software, hardware blocks, ADC, etc.), but the same over-arching concept reigns true throughout. Today, the self-capacitance implementation seems to serve best for longer range proximity distances. The device charges a sense electrode of unknown capacitance to a known potential. The electrode is typically a copper area on a PCB (could be any conductive material, including ITO).

Hand over a table that has a PCB and sensor resting on it to detect proximity

A hand over a table that has a PCB and sensor resting on it to detect proximity

The sensor layout can be done in a variety of ways, but the most effective and efficient, is the loop sensor (or commonly called loop antenna). This is just a copper trace of approx 10mm thick around the outside area that is to be proximity enabled.

For a thermostat this would likely be a loop around the outside of the entire box, completely invisible to the user, but able to drive long-range detection. The larger the loop the longer the total range (diminishing returns at a certain size).

Hand approaching a dead-fronted thermostat and it waking-up
Hand approaching a dead-fronted thermostat and it waking-up
Hand approaching a dead-fronted thermostat and it waking-up

An animation of a hand approaching a dead-fronted thermostat and it waking-up

As with all technologies there are trade-offs associated with power, response rate, and noise immunity. If you can increase the acquisition rate with shorter burst lengths, this will result in lower power consumption and increased proximity range. The total reliable range you can achieve will depend on all of these factors, plus your particular application, packaging, and environmental conditions.

All capacitive proximity can be set-up to do physical touch sensing (where the finger makes contact with the sensor) or tuned to do proximity sensing (where the hand only needs to couple with the sensor's e-field). Ideally, the same IC can drive both proximity sensing and standard button, slider, and wheel implementations, while minimizing the number of external components required.

Other forms of proximity detection

There are other forms of proximity detection. As discussed earlier, the most commonly used today is IR / PIR, but it has its trade-offs. There are also magnetic, optical, ultrasonic, and others. Each has their respective pros and cons associated with them.

Capacitive proximity detection, in most applications & environmental conditions, offers the most advantages (product differentiation, low power, low cost, no visible sensors, etc.), from physically touching a surface to a distance away of 6” or 15cms reliably (capacitive proximity is capable of much longer ranges, just with all the outside factors and trade-offs associated with them). This revolutionary technology can make all of the above benefits happen so that you are able to differentiate your end-product.

Page 1 of 1

About the author

Patrick Hanley joined Atmel Corporation in August 2010 as the marketing manager for the touch technology team focusing on buttons, sliders and wheels (BSW). Mr. Hanley’s responsibility includes defining new products, pricing, channel management, and many other functions for the success of the BSW product line within the Touch Business Unit at Atmel. Mr. Hanley holds a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering (BSEE) and a minor in business administration from Marquette University in Milwaukee, WI.

Atmel Corporation is a worldwide leader in the design and manufacture of microcontrollers, capacitive touch solutions, advanced logic, mixed-signal, non-volatile memory and radio frequency (RF) components. Leveraging one of the industry's broadest intellectual property (IP) technology portfolios, Atmel is able to provide the electronics industry with complete system solutions focused on industrial, consumer, communications, computing and automotive markets.

Most popular articles in Processing & embedded

  • Deep Learning Challenges in Embedded Platforms
  • Choice: Microcontroller, MCU or Microprocessor, MPU
  • Capacitive Proximity Sensing Technology Update
  • Embedded World 2017
  • Key considerations for Windows Embedded End of Life
  • Share this page

    Want more like this? Register for our newsletter

    GaN’s Ground-Floor Opportunity Rudy Ramos | Mouser Electronics
    GaN’s Ground-Floor Opportunity
    The electronics industry has a major role to play in helping to save energy, by enabling better equipment and new ways of working and living that that are more efficient and environmentally friendly. Maintaining the pace of technological progress is key, but improvements become both smaller and harder to achieve as each technology matures. We can see this trend in the development of power semiconductors, as device designers seek more complex and expensive ways to reduce switching energy and RDS(ON) against silicon’s natural limitations.

    Radio-Electronics.com is operated and owned by Adrio Communications Ltd and edited by Ian Poole. All information is © Adrio Communications Ltd and may not be copied except for individual personal use. This includes copying material in whatever form into website pages. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information on Radio-Electronics.com, no liability is accepted for any consequences of using it. This site uses cookies. By using this site, these terms including the use of cookies are accepted. More explanation can be found in our Privacy Policy